National Heroes

Well I tend to have radical thoughts on most things, so if you're the conformist type, please read no further..... For those ready to look past the obvious, well read on...

India has been a fool's nation for far too long a duration ... We've always worshipped men and worshipped them to an extent where it no longer remains reasonable....It becomes despicable. It has reached to a point where the most fundamental of all rights is limited to only the written constitution. Anything that goes against a "somebody" is opposed blindly by his/her followers.

Leaders are expected to follow the party lines, no matter what. This is the height of foolishness. What makes our people so docile and insipid ? And while that is so, we as a people are still arrogant enough to blindly declare ourselves as the "greatest democracy" . Well I don't see any reason to cheer our ability to grow our population.....how about trying to judge our ability to provide these people the very basic necessities of life (let me tell you, dignity has to be above food , shelter and clothing in my book when it comes to the basic necessities.

Coming back to our heroes.

We credit Mr. M.K.Gandhi as the bringer of the freedom. I see this as a nonsensical belief and the fact in my is that the British left India as a part of their new post-world war strategy of spreading their empire by other means (as the war had made them realize that physical occupation is not a sustainable method of long term control.) . Mr Gandhi only delayed the attainment of independence through his arbitrary decisions ( which appear to be tactical if you don't mind believing in the idea that Mr. Gandhi could have been a mole planted by the British themselves to dilute the armed uprising in India through the "ahinsak" propaganda.) At best , Mr Gandhi was an impractical idealist who could hardly look past his prejudices and did not care putting the greater good at risk for his "ideals". Why then would we praise him for taking us to freedom ?

The only reason that the powers that be want to promote "gandhi-ism" seems to be that they want the people to remain docile. They fear the prospect of an armed revolution. They know that the people will unite and fight back if pushed beyond an extent and the only way to prevent this is to attack their ideologies from a young age. Hence this teaching of "showing your other cheek when slapped on one" ...... This ensures that the general population remains subservient to them and never revolts.

This however is not enough. We were coming up with a potentially change inducing student revolution in the late 70s and the early 80's. The youth was apparently not prepared to lie down an accept whatever was fed to it. People were ready to fight for their rights,particularly the younger lot with their energy manifesting itself in protests. The rulers clearly saw this and apparently decided to come up with a policy of blurring the vision and thought processes of the young in India. This policy apparently included changing their value system to a point where material gains are all that they care about. It also appeared to include using the the media to incrementally lure the masses into a state where they become excessively obsessed about sex and sexuality. The young people across India (and across the world) have been fed with TV, Cinema and Commercials which place before them ideals that they are supposed to emulate. They are supposed to look "sexy" and "cool" before all else and this is too big a distraction...big enough to make the pertinent appear irrelevant and the farce appear obvious. Human mind functions in strange ways, what we se is what we choose to ...it depends on our perspective as much as anything else and that also determines our responses.

Now that the powers that be have the national population in a docile and subservient state, the only thing that can possibly awake them is a sense of shock. It could come from utter humiliation-- which is why they keep feeding us about this "Mera bharat mahaan" and "India Growth story" and the "India to be in top 3 by 2050" ......But they will not just be upbeat, they also keep challenging the collective national consciousness by posing threats...thus the fears are propagated by the media. The media plays to their tune automatically as the values of commercialism make them seek TRPs. Fear attracts people to the TV sets, this automatically turns the news channels and newspapers into "Fear spreading agencies" . The state of fear makes sure that:

1. The people feel a sense of togetherness and "collective paranoia" -- this cripples critical thinking.

2. People do not completely believe the positive propaganda either(mera bharat mahaan stuff) because after complete belief in a false idea, disillusionment is inevitable.

3. This is done only to an extent such that the people can neither completely agree nor disagree with the propaganda. Thus falling slaves to their fears -which are planted and exploited by the media.

Some common fears used to exploit people:

1.Terrorism.
2.Global Warming(CO2)
3.Diseases.
4.War (Hostile Nation)
5.Unknown (Mostly non-existent) fears.

each of the above are used to good effect...

e.g: The US invation to IRAQ:

Pretext: Presence of WMD's in IRAQ (Fear) --Potential terrorist attack on American soil (fear) .

This helped the US justify the invation of Iraq and helped companies like Haliburton.

Pretext: The possibiliy of a power crisis

Helped justify the India-US nuclear deal when about 75% of India's Hydro-electric potential is unttapped. (http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2007/01/13/stories/2007011303631000.htm)

Well It is late...I am drowsy (I must have made lots of typos and grammatical mistakes :P. ... ) and I might have to leave for home tomorrow, So I would end this here for now and shall complete it later (Probably on the 4th of next year) .


BTW: Happy New Year 2010. !! :D